A law firm’s own website is not the place to verify when a lawyer was actually called to the bar. For Kay Law Professional Corporation in Kitchener, that confirmation comes from the Canadian Law List, an independent legal directory, which shows both of the firm’s lawyers, James D. Clarke and Alexandria Nowak, called to the Ontario bar in the same year: 2001. In 2026, that marks 25 years at the Ontario bar for both.

Kay Law is built around those two lawyers rather than a larger roster, and having both confirmed through the same independent source gives Kitchener clients a way to check their standing before their first consultation.

Key Takeaways

• James D. Clarke was called to the Ontario bar in 2001, confirmed through the Canadian Law List.
• Alexandria Nowak was called to the Ontario bar in the same year, 2001, also confirmed through the Canadian Law List.
• In 2026, that marks 25 years since both lawyers were called to the bar.
• The practical next step: clients can review each lawyer’s practice areas before booking a consultation to confirm the right fit for their matter.

Two Decades of Practice, Confirmed Independently

A bar call year is one of the more straightforward facts to verify about a lawyer, since it comes from a record outside the lawyer’s own control. The Canadian Law List, an independent directory used across the Ontario legal profession, confirms that both James D. Clarke and Alexandria Nowak were called to the bar in 2001. That means both lawyers at Kay Law have been practising for roughly a quarter century by the time a client sits down with either one.

Having that detail corroborated by a source separate from the firm’s own marketing gives prospective clients a way to confirm experience level without relying solely on what the firm says about itself.

James D. Clarke’s Path to Kay Law

According to the firm’s own site, James D. Clarke spent time earlier in his career as a Bay Street lawyer working on public and private mergers and acquisitions, securities work, and initial public offerings, later serving in an in house legal role at a major Canadian software company before joining Kay Law in 2009. Those details come from the firm’s own description of his background rather than from independent corroboration, so they are worth treating as context about his stated career path rather than an externally verified claim. His current role at Kay Law centers on business law, real estate, and wills and estates matters.

Alexandria Nowak’s Family Law and Dispute Resolution Focus

Alexandria Nowak leads Kay Law’s family law and dispute resolution work, according to the firm’s site, handling matters under Ontario’s Family Law Act and Children’s Law Reform Act alongside mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration. Her 2001 bar call, confirmed through the same independent directory as Clarke’s, places her at a similar point in her career in terms of years practising law in Ontario.

What a Shared Bar Call Year Signals

Both lawyers sharing a 2001 bar call year is a coincidence of timing rather than a shared career path, but it does mean Kay Law’s two lawyer roster carries a consistent baseline of experience rather than pairing a long tenured lawyer with someone newly called. A client working with either Clarke or Nowak is working with a lawyer who has practised in Ontario for a comparable length of time.

Neither Lawyer Claims Specialist Status

Kay Law’s site does not describe either lawyer as a certified specialist, and a full scan of the firm’s pages finds no use of that term. Under the Law Society of Ontario’s rules, “specialist” is a protected term reserved for lawyers who hold a specific LSO certification, and Kay Law’s own copy avoids the claim entirely. That restraint matches what a client should expect to see from a firm staying within the bounds of how lawyers are permitted to describe their own credentials.

Starting a Consultation With Kay Law

Clients in Kitchener weighing which lawyer fits their matter can meet the firm’s lawyers before booking a first consultation. Both Clarke and Nowak bring a comparable length of practice experience, confirmed through the same independent legal directory, to the specific practice areas they each lead.